Eye Candy

[arpeejay]

Not every day that I get three hotties in the liberry at the same time but I suppose today is my lucky day!

(1) I imagine I've mentioned him before. About 6 ft., dirty blond hair, soul patch, very broad shoulders, tight midsection, NICE arms. Not huge but definitely in the 17 inch range and when he stretches his triceps just POP out! He knows he's a hottie and I'm inclined to think he gives a little extra show when I'm around.

(2) Pocket-sized version of # 1. Maybe 5'7 or 5'8, 160 lbs., but broad shoulders, perky pecs, tight waist, bubble butt. Not quite buzz cut light brown hair, chin fuzz.

(3) Wow! Not quite as well-built as the other two but TALL (6'2, at least) and really, actually model handsome. You could cut glass on his cheekbones, the jawline looks like it's carved from stainless steel. If he smiled I'm sure he could melt butter but he's got that broody thing going on.

Oy!

Good thing I'm leaving early and heading to the gym directly afterwards!

:-)

xoxo

richard

[jfrdricks63]

Originally Posted by arpeejay

Not every day that I get three hotties in the liberry at the same time but I suppose today is my lucky day!

(1) I imagine I've mentioned him before. About 6 ft., dirty blond hair, soul patch, very broad shoulders, tight midsection, NICE arms. Not huge but definitely in the 17 inch range and when he stretches his triceps just POP out! He knows he's a hottie and I'm inclined to think he gives a little extra show when I'm around.

(2) Pocket-sized version of # 1. Maybe 5'7 or 5'8, 160 lbs., but broad shoulders, perky pecs, tight waist, bubble butt. Not quite buzz cut light brown hair, chin fuzz.

(3) Wow! Not quite as well-built as the other two but TALL (6'2, at least) and really, actually model handsome. You could cut glass on his cheekbones, the jawline looks like it's carved from stainless steel. If he smiled I'm sure he could melt butter but he's got that broody thing going on.

Oy!

Good thing I'm leaving early and heading to the gym directly afterwards!

:-)

xoxo

richard

Theres a guy at work that I sit behind the next row of semicubes over and i get to see every time he streatches and sometimes he absentmindedly flexes his muscles. He is a true sight to behold. I am in love with this dude.

[kollejboy]

audubon or clearfield?

[arpeejay]

Neither, I'm afraid, or I'd hang out those two places more often.

GCC in Batavia.

xoxo

Richard

[nypup2train]

Originally Posted by arpeejay

(3) Wow! Not quite as well-built as the other two but TALL (6'2, at least) and really, actually model handsome. You could cut glass on his cheekbones, [COLOR="Gray"][...][/COLOR]

Darn. Well, I suppose nobody's perfect. ;(

(I've never found guys attractive when their looks are "too perfect" in terms of the media/society standard of beauty. I call it "California pretty" -- just one of the 864 things about living in the Los Angeles area that didn't work for me, back when I tried.)

Still, overall a great set of sightings -- I envy your vantage point, if so much worthwhile scenery keeps happening by! Thanks for reminding me why I need to get out more!

[Gene]

Originally Posted by nypup2train

... (I've never found guys attractive when their looks are "too perfect" in terms of the media/society standard of beauty. I call it "California pretty" ...

Ooh, good! I like that term "california pretty" can I use it? It's not jealousy, it's rejection of what some over paid media people define as handsome. Same thing as female models being too thin. The guys that are just too tanned, too wide cheek boned, too perfecly spiked hair, just too too idealized, are boringly manufactured.

I loved the movie Zoolander because it sums up my feeling about that whole big city fashion hype. Usless narciscism fostered on the rest of us at high prices.