| ||||
| Welcome, Anonymous. You last visited: Today at 04:56 AM | ||||||
| Surveys & Polls Cast your vote or create your own polls here! |
| Community Links |
| Social Groups |
| Contacts & Friends |
| Members List |
| Search Forums |
| Advanced Search |
| Find All Thanked Posts |
| Quick Links | ||||
| Today's Posts | ||||
| Mark Forums Read | ||||
| Open Contacts Popup | ||||
| User Control Panel | ||||
| Edit Signature | ||||
| Go to Page... |
 |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
 July 22nd, 2006, 05:16 AM | |||
| |||
| Symmetry or Size? When it comes to the kind of men you like or aspire to become, do you value Symmetry (wide shoulders, tapering down to a narrow waist, and quads that flair out) or do you feel that sheer powerful looking size is more important/attractive. To help understand this question, do you like the physique of Chad Ray Martin or Nasser El Sonbaty?     |
| July 23rd, 2006, 03:25 AM | |||
| |||
| Nasser El Sonbaty definately but offseason.. more like a bigger bret akers or a power lifter (but not some of the ones with a huge gut compared to the muscle) never liked the |
| July 25th, 2006, 01:39 AM | |||
| |||
| If it comes down to those two, I'd take Nasser. |
| July 26th, 2006, 04:38 AM | |||
| |||
| Size Wins! Honestly, I'm rather surprised that size beats out symmetry. The "average" American finds guys like Sagi Kalev and Chad Ray Martin far more appealing to the eye than Markus Ruhl or Ronnie Coleman (this is just my opinion; not based on studies). But, this isn't a "scientific" poll either. After all, the name of this website is MuscleGrowth.org! LOL. |
| July 26th, 2006, 07:26 AM | |||
| |||
| Size, I love size. Can't ever be too big. But Chad Ray Martin does have a hot bod. Woof!  |
| February 5th, 2007, 01:57 AM | |||
| |||
| Well, I voted for symmetry, but I LOVE size! There is just something about thick hulking muscularity that will always turn heads. I myself have never been a fan of the ripped competition look...... I like that balance of muscularity and thickness. Yeah, now THAT'S the ticket. I saw a guy the other day at the supermarket that was about my height (6' 1"), and this guy had symmetry and he was so thick that even with a sweatshirt on you could make out EVERY muscle in his back, traps and arms! And of couse as a fellow lifter I had to say howdy. LOL! And he was cool to boot! |
| February 6th, 2007, 07:51 AM | |||
| |||
| Size is what I find hottest. Symmetry and definition is what I have and make the most of. Ideally I need a huge guy to "worship" who really ADORES definition and balance. Like you bigguy. You, by the way, are TOTALLY AWESOME. As if you didn't know (smile). |
| February 6th, 2007, 08:47 AM | |||
| |||
| Symmetry for me. I know lots of you guys get off on the big monsters, but I prefer the Bob Paris/Frank Zane types, maybe a little bigger than them, but the Jay Cutler monsters on steriods turn me off. |
| February 11th, 2007, 06:07 PM | |||
| |||
| I defenetly love size ! I like the freakest bodybuilders. But lots of huge guys have great upper body and crapy thigh and claves... And that's a real shame. Great legs and great claves increase the massiveness of a huge guy. |
|
| vBulletin Message | |
| Cancel Changes | |
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode |
 Switch to Hybrid Mode |
 Switch to Threaded Mode |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:36 PM.
Addendum by archiver: This page was originally part of musclegrowth.org and exists as part of an overall archive under Fair Use. It was created on April 16 for the purpose of preserving the original site exactly as rendered. Minor changes have been made to facilitate offline use; no content has been altered. All authors retain copyright of their works. The archive or pages within may not be used for commercial purposes.