|
| Welcome, Anonymous. You last visited: Today at 04:56 AM |
General General discussion about male muscle growth |
Community Links |
Social Groups |
Contacts & Friends |
Members List |
Search Forums |
Advanced Search |
Find All Thanked Posts |
Quick Links | ||||
Today's Posts | ||||
Mark Forums Read | ||||
Open Contacts Popup | ||||
User Control Panel | ||||
Edit Signature |
Go to Page... |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| |||
Muscle Proportion Calculations A while back--I'm talking a couple of years, most likely--I found a set of formulas for calculating proper muscle proportions, based on the "golden triangle" --a rule of Pythagoras, perhaps. I know it's been published in more than one muscle magazine over the years. Does anyone have any info on these formulas? Thanks in advance for any help or advice. GlamLeatherPunk |
| |||
It's wasn't based on the golden triangle or anything, but was based on actual mathematics (which I suppose is the same thing) http://www.impulseadventure.com/weights/ideal.html gives a detailed idea of what to look for (if you don't mind doing a bit of maths!) __________________ The stronger they are, the more muscled they are |
| |||
Quote:
Because it's Perl, most of you (those running Windows or default-setup MacOS) won't have the ability to run the script unless you install a Perl interpreter, which is admittedly a lot to ask just to run a throw-away bit of fantasy math. But, hey, I'm on UNIX where Perl is standard equipment, so neener neener. <EG> ...Actually, come to think of it, Perl might be standard on MacOS as well, but you'd have to go into the Terminal to run it... which I hear is scary. For anyone who's really curious, or aspires to geekitude (if you run Perl on Windows, you've got automatic geek cred) and feels like installing ActiveState Perl in order to run the code, here's a copy of IdealProportions.pl I threw into my geocities account. Since there's renewed interest, depending how bored I get in the next few hours, maybe I'll finally get around to converting it into a nice chunk of run-anywhere JavaScript and throw it up on the web. Last edited by nypup2train; July 28th, 2006 at 12:56 AM. Reason: Fixed broken URL tags around IdealProportions.pl link. |
| |||
The Average Man Just for comparison, I thought you guys might like to see the "average man" calculations used for designing seats, doors, etc. in the United States. [The number in the brackets is the Standard Deviation] Ht - 68.6 in [2.74 in] Wt - 166.3 lb (Ideal is 148-160) Neck - 14.8 in [.79] Biceps - flexed - 12.6 in [1.22] Forearm - flexed - 11.65 in [.82] Chest - 37.25 in [2.64] Waist - 32.3 in [3.31] Hips - 37.8 in [2.61] Upper Thigh - 22.00 in [1.88] Mid Calf - 14.3 in [1.16] The ideal chart says this man is 2.44 and the differences are interesting. Since these were calculated the average man's weight in the US has gone up to 189.8 lb. but I do not have the corresponding changes in measures. |
| |||
well i ran your perl script and hell i'd love to be the stats it spat out.. shame i'm more fat than muscle Computing proportions for WHR of 4.73333466666667 Lin fit: Forearms = 18.4892568550667 Chest = 61.55651167 Thigh = 33.2297929677333 Waist = 46.3041222102667 Neck = 23.4139510469333 Biceps = 22.2361709233333 Calf = 22.2361709233333 Hips = 55.4214905176 Log fit: Forearms = 17.0423610268574 Chest = 56.7521573858945 Thigh = 30.6329725050254 Waist = 42.6343907952899 Neck = 21.6144374966066 Biceps = 20.4811010261443 Calf = 20.4811010261443 Hips = 51.087887210339 |
| |||
Too many numbers!!! *head explodes* Gonna calculate pi next? |
| |||
Ask and you shall recieve.... 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375 10 58209749445923078164062862089986280348253421170679 82148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128 48111745028410270193852110555964462294895493038196 44288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091 45648566923460348610454326648213393607260249141273 72458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436 78925903600113305305488204665213841469519415116094 33057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548 07446237996274956735188575272489122793818301194912 98336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798 60943702770539217176293176752384674818467669405132 00056812714526356082778577134275778960917363717872 14684409012249534301465495853710507922796892589235 42019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960 51870721134999999837297804995105973173281609631859 50244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881 71010003137838752886587533208381420617177669147303 59825349042875546873115956286388235378759375195778 18577805321712268066130019278766111959092164201989 |
| |||
The ideal uncrackable PIN code!! |
| |||
I might be dense and not understand what those numbers refer to but I thought the initial question was asking what the ideal relative proportions of a male would be. Something like chest to waist ratio, chest-thigh ratio, etc. Maybe the person who originated this thread can clarify his intent. |
| |||
That would be pi to, what, the 500th? It's a joke on TheMM's comment about too many numbers! |
vBulletin Message | |
Cancel Changes |
Display Modes |
Linear Mode |
Switch to Hybrid Mode |
Switch to Threaded Mode |
|
|